Checking Rights

An IR Manager’s Guide to Checking Copyright

  • Stewart Baker Western Oregon University
  • Sue Kunda Western Oregon University

Abstract

Institutional repository (IR) managers often find themselves providing copyright guidance to faculty who wish to self-archive their published scholarship or to students depositing theses and dissertations. As IR managers may not be copyright experts themselves, making determinations and checking rights can be difficult and time-consuming. This article is intended as a practical guide to describe common types of material that can be placed in an IR as well as potential copyright issues and other considerations for each type. Material types covered include book chapters, journal articles, conference proceedings, student papers, electronic theses and dissertations, research data sets, historical and archival materials, and oral histories. Underlying issues such as copyright ownership, work made for hire, and the legal definition of publication are also discussed. For easier reference, the appendix contains a chart with brief descriptions of issues and resources.

References

American Historical Association. (2013). American Historical Association statement on policies regarding the embargoing of completed history PhD dissertations. Retrieved from https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/summer-2013/american-historical-association-statement-on-policies-regarding-the-embargoing-of-completed-history-phd-dissertations

Benson, S. R. (2019). Copyright conundrums: Rights issues in the digitization of library collections. In J. Myntti & J. Zoom (Eds.), Digital preservation in libraries: Preparing for a sustainable future (pp. 305–320). Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/102161/EDITIONS-ALCTS-Digital-CH17–002.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Bergin, M. B., & Roh, C. (2016). Systematically populating an IR with ETDs: Launching a retrospective digitization project and collecting current ETDs. In B. B. Callicott, D. Scherer, & A. Wesolek (Eds.), Making institutional repositories work (pp. 127–138). Retrieved from www.oapen.org/search?identifier=626981

Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6): 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634

Callicott, B. B., Scherer, D., & Wesolek, A. (Eds.). (2015). Making institutional repositories work. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.

Carroll, M. W. (2015). Sharing research data and intellectual property law: A primer. PLoS Biology, 13(8). Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002235

CENDI. (2017). Frequently asked questions about copyright (CENDI/2008-1). Retrieved from https://cendi.gov/publications/FAQ_Copyright_30jan18.pdf

Childress v. Taylor, 945 F.2d Supp. 500 (2nd Cir. 1991).

Clement, G., & Levine, M. (2011). Copyright and publication status of pre-1978 dissertations: A content analysis approach. Portal: Libraries and the academy, 11(3), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0031

Conrad, L. (2011). Journal article versioning is harder that it looks . . . or should be! Against the Grain, 23(2), 20 22. https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.5785

Cotter, T. F. (2008). Toward a functional definition of publication in copyright law. Minnesota Law Review, 92(6), 1724-1795.

Daigle, B. J. (2012). The digital transformation of special collections. Journal of Library Administration, 52(3–4), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2012.684504

Dawson, P., & Yang, S. (2016). Institutional repositories, open access and copyright: What are the practices and implications? Science & Technology Libraries, 35(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2016.1224994

Department of Education clarifies access to theses. (1993, September). ALAWON. Retrieved from http://serials.infomotions.com/alawon/alawon-v2n37.txt

Dryden, J. (2012). Guidelines to support professional copyright practice. Journal of Archival Organization, 10(2), 150–154. doi:10.1080/15332748.2012.702500

Eustis, T. W. (1976). Get It in Writing: Oral History and the Law. The Oral History Review, 4, 6-18.

Fowler, J. L. (2017). Academics at work: mentoring in research, teaching, and service. International journal for academic development, 22(4), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1310105

Gerhardt, D. R. (2011). Copyright publication: An empirical study. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(1), 135–204.

Gertz, G. A. (2013). Copyrights in faculty-created works: How licensing can solve the academic work-for-hire dilemma. Washington Law Review, 88(4), 1465–1496.

Giesecke, J. (2011). Institutional repositories: Keys to success. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5–6), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.589340

Hellyer, P. (2016). Who owns this article: Applying copyright’s work made for hire doctrine to librarians’ scholarship. Law Library Journal, 108(1), 33–54.

Hirtle, P. B., Hudson, E., & Kenyon, A. T. (2009). Copyright and cultural institutions: Guidelines for digitization for U.S. libraries, archives, and museums. Retrieved from Cornell University eCommons website: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/14142/Hirtle-Copyright_final_RGB_lowres-cover1.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

IEEE. (2018). IEEE Publication Services and Products Board operations manual. Retrieved from https://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/pubs/pspb/opsmanual.pdf

Keener, M. (2015). Contextualizing copyright: Fostering students’ understanding of their rights and responsibilities as content creators. Virginia Libraries, 61, 37–42. Retrieved from https://wakespace.lib.wfu.edu/handle/10339/56689

Lange, J. (2016). Scholarly management publication and open access funding mandates: A review of publisher policies. Ticker: The Academic Business Librarianship Review, 1(3), 15–27. Retrieved from http://ticker.mcgill.ca/article/view/19

Lawson, S., Gray, J., & Mauri, M. (2016). Opening the black box of scholarly communication funding: A public data infrastructure for financial flows in academic publishing. Open Library of Humanities, 2(1), 1–35. http://doi.org/10.16995/olh.72

Leary, H., Lundstrom, K., & Martin, P. (2012). Copyright solutions for institutional repositories: A collaboration with subject librarians. Journal of Library Innovation, 3(1), 101–110. Retrieved from https://www.dropbox.com/s/2jizyib4be4s46t/Copyright.pdf?dl=1

Linde, P., Eriksson, J., Kullman, L., Fathli, M., Karlsson, K., Sikström, M., . . . Tång, I. (2011). Accessibility and self-archiving of conference articles: A study on a selection of Swedish institutional repositories. Information Services and Use, 31(3–4), 259–269. http://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-2012–0656

Macklin, L. (2013). Copyright and institutional repositories. In P. Bluh & C. Hepfer (Eds.), The institutional repository: Benefits and challenges. Retrieved from https://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/r9thx

McFarlane, B. (2012). Re-framing student academic freedom: A capability perspective. Higher Education, 63(6), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9473-4

McKiernan, E. C. (2012, October 31). Who owns research data and the rights to publish? Part II. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://emckiernan.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/who-owns-research-data-and-the-rights-to-publish-part-ii/

McMillan, G. (2016). Electronic theses and dissertations: Preparing graduate students for their futures. In B. B. Callicott, D. Scherer, & A. Wesolek (Eds.), Making institutional repositories work (pp. 107–126). Retrieved from www.oapen.org/search?identifier=626981

Molinelli-Freytes v. University of Puerto Rico, 792 F. Supp. 2d 164 (D.P.R. 2010).

National Institutes of Health. (2014). Frequently asked questions about the NIH Public Access Policy. Retrieved from https://publicaccess.nih.gov/faq.htm

Neuenschwander, J. A. (1983). Oral history and copyright: An uncertain relationship. Journal of College and University Law, 10(2), 147-166.

Nimmer, M. B. (1956). Copyright publication. Columbia Law Review, 56(2), 185–202.

Patel, S. H. (1996). Graduate students' ownership and attribution rights in intellectual property. Indiana Law Journal, 71(2), 481-512.

Ramírez, M. L., Dalton, J. T., McMillan, G., Read, M., & Seamans, N. H. (2013). Do open access electronic theses and dissertations diminish publishing opportunities in the social sciences and humanities? Findings from a 2011 survey of academic publishers. College & Research Libraries, 74(4), 368–380. http://doi.org/10.5860/crl-356

Ramírez, M. L., & McMillan, G. (2010). FERPA and student work: Considerations for electronic theses and dissertations. D-Lib Magazine, 16(1/2). doi:10.1045/january2010-contents Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january10/ramirez/01ramirez.html

Ramírez, M. L., McMillan, G., Dalton, J. T., Hanlon, A., Smith, H. S., & Kern, C. (2014). Do open access electronic theses and dissertations diminish publishing opportunities in the sciences? College & Research Libraries, 75(6), 808–821. http://doi.org/10.5860/crl-356

Repanovici, A. A., & Barsan, I. M. (2015). Integration of SHERPA/RoMEO in institutional digital repositories to address the uncertainty of copyright. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 20(1), 29–45. Retrieved from https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/1740

Rinehart, A., & Cunningham, J. (2017). Breaking it down: A brief exploration of institutional repository submission agreements. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(1), 39–48. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2016.10.002

Rubel, D. (2007). Accessing their voice from anywhere: Analysis of the legal issues surrounding the online use of oral histories. Archival Issues, 31(2), 171-187.

Rupp-Serrano, K., & Waller, J. (2018). Dissertation-to-book publication patterns among a sample of R1 institutions. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(1), 1-23. http://doi.org/10.7710/2162–3309.2187

Ryvard, R. (2013, July 26). Embargo or perish [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/07/26/despite-warnings-young-scholars-could-be-doomed-open-access-dissertations-evidence

Scheufen, M. (2015). Copyright versus open access: On the organisation and international political economy of access to scientific knowledge. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-12739-2

Seidemann, R. M. (2004). Authorship and control: Ethical and legal issues of student research in archaeology. Albany Law Journal of Science Technology, 14(2), 451–496.

SHERPA/RoMEO. (n.d.). Definitions and terms. Retrieved from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/definitions.php

SHERPA/RoMEO. (n.d.). Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving. Retrieved from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/PDFandIR.html

Shopes, L. (2006). Legal and ethical issues in oral history. In T.L. Charlton, L.E. Myers, & R. Sharpless (Eds.), Handbook of oral history (135-170). Lanham, MD: Rowman Altameria.

Simone, D. (2019). Copyright and collective authorship: Locating the authors of collaborative work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Simons, N., & Richardson, J. (2013). New content in digital repositories: The changing research landscape. Burlington, VT: Elsevier Science.

Stephenson, S. E. (1987). Protect Your Collection: Oral History and Copyright. The Public Historian, 9(4), 20-33.

Strauss, N. S. (2011). Anything but academic: How copyright’s work-for-hire doctrine affects professors, graduate students, and k-12 teachers in the information age. Richmond Journal of Law Technology, 18(1), 1–48.

University of California. (n.d.). Works created at UC. Retrieved from http://copyright.universityofcalifornia.edu/ownership/works-created-at-uc.html

US Copyright Office. (1997). Report on legal protection for databases. Retrieved from https://www.copyright.gov/reports/db4.pdf

US Copyright Office. (2017a). Circular 1: Copyright basics. Retrieved from https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf

US Copyright Office. (2017b). Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office practices. 3rd edition. Retrieved from https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/

US Office of Management and Budget. (1999). Circular A-110: Uniform administrative requirements for grants and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2012-title2-vol1/CFR-2012-title2-vol1-part215

Published
2019-11-30