Digital Cultural Heritage and Wikimedia Commons Licenses:

Copyright or Copywrong?


  • Elizabeth Joan Kelly Loyola University New Orleans



Cultural heritage institutions can contribute to public knowledge and increase awareness of their collections by uploading digital objects to Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia Foundation projects. However, prior research has established the difficulty of and/or hesitation by many cultural heritage institutions in clearly and accurately labeling the copyright status of their born-digital and digitized collections. With this knowledge, how likely is it that digital cultural heritage will be findable and usable on Wikimedia Commons? This study seeks to determine how accurate rights statements for cultural heritage objects on Wikimedia Commons are, and whether inaccuracies can be linked to problematic rights statements in cultural heritage digital libraries or whether the inaccuracies stem from Wikimedia Commons. By evaluating the rights statements, licenses, and sources for 308 Wikimedia Commons objects from 57 cultural heritage organizations and comparing that information to corresponding licenses from digital libraries, we can begin to develop best practices and educational needs for digital librarians, archives, museum curators, and Wikipedians alike to improve the user experience for those using digital cultural heritage on Wikimedia projects.



Metrics Loading ...


Anonymous. (2009). Collections are for use, but is Wikipedia the outlet? Library Journal, 134(19), 15–16.

Architecting Sustainable Futures. (n.d.). About the project [Webpage]. Retrieved April 8, 2019, from

Ballinger, L., Karl, B., & Chiu, A. (2017). Providing quality rights metadata for digital collections through Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice, 5(2), 144–158.

Bauder, J., & Emanuel, J. (2012). Being where our faculty are: Emerging technology use and faculty information-seeking workflows. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 17(2), 65–82.

Brinkerink, M. (2015, June 23). Dutch cultural heritage reaches millions every month. OpenGLAM. Retrieved from

Capell, L., & Williams, E. (2016). Assigning rights statements to legacy digital collections. Poster session presented at the Rare Books & Manuscript Section conference, Coral Gables, FL. Retrieved from

Chesney, T. (2006, November). An empirical examination of Wikipedia’s credibility. First Monday, 11(1). Retrieved from

Commons:Categories. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Commons:Copyright tags. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Commons:Email templates. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Commons:First steps/License selection. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Commons:Hirtle chart. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Commons:Licensing. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Commons:Non-copyright restrictions. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Commons:Structured data/Get involved/Feedback requests/First licensing consultation. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 3, 2019, from

Commons talk:Structured data/Get involved/Feedback requests/First licensing consultation. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved April 8, 2019, from

Cooban, G. (2017). Should archivists edit Wikipedia, and if so how? Archives & Records, 38(2), 257–272.

Creative Commons. Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0). (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Documenting the Now. (n.d.). Retrieved April 8, 2019, from

Dowell, M. L., & Bridges, L. M. (2019). A perspective on Wikipedia: Your students are here, why aren’t you? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(2), 81–83.

Dryden, J. (2011). Copyfraud or legitimate concerns? Controlling further uses of online archival holdings. American Archivist, 74(2), 522–543.

Dryden, J. (2012). Cavalier or careful? How users approach the rights management practices of archival repositories. Journal of Archival Organization, 10(3/4), 191–206.

Elder, D., Westbrook, R. N., & Reilly, M. (2012). Wikipedia lover, not a hater: Harnessing Wikipedia to increase the discoverability of library resources. Journal of Web Librarianship, 6(1), 32–44.

Erickson, K., Heald, P. J., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2015). Copyright and the value of the public domain: An empirical assessment (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2571220). Retrieved from World Intellectual Property Office website:

Eschenfelder, K. R., & Caswell, M. (2010). Digital cultural collections in an age of reuse and remixes. First Monday, 15(11).

Ferriero, D. S. (2011). On the growing relationship between the National Archives and Wikipedia. Vital Speeches of the Day, 77(10), 367–369.

Galloway, E., & DellaCorte, C. (2014). Increasing the discoverability of digital collections using Wikipedia. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice, 2(1), 84–96.

Hirtle, P. B. (2001, Fall). Unpublished materials, new technologies, and copyright: Facilitating scholarly use. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 49(1). Retrieved from

Historypin. (2018). Moving beyond colonial models of digital memory (based on planning grant LG-72-16-0113-16). Institute of Museum and Library Services. Retrieved from

Kelly, E. J. (2018a). Content analysis of Google alerts for cultural heritage institutions. Journal of Web Librarianship, 12(1), 28–45.

Kelly, E. J. (2018b). Use of Louisiana’s digital cultural heritage by Wikipedians. Journal of Web Librarianship, 12(2), 85–106.

Lally, A. M., & Dunford, C. E. (2007). Using Wikipedia to extend digital collections. D-Lib Magazine, 13(5/6).

Miller, R. (2014, August 29). Millions of historic images posted to Flickr [Blog post]. Retrieved from

Nagaraj, A. (2018). Does copyright affect reuse? Evidence from Google Books and Wikipedia. Management Science, 64(7), 3091–3107.

Needham, C. (2017). Understanding copyfraud: Public domain images and false claims of copyright. Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 36(2), 219–230.

Perrin, J. M., Winkler, H., Daniel, K., Barba, S., & Yang, L. (2017). Know your crowd: A case study in digital collection marketing. Reference Librarian, 58(3), 190–201.

Resolution: Licensing policy. (n.d.). Wikimedia Foundation governance wiki. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from

Schlosser, M. (2009). Unless otherwise indicated: A survey of copyright statements on digital library collections. College & Research Libraries, 70(4), 371–385.

Sims, N. (2017). Rights, ethics, accuracy, and open licenses in online collections. College & Research Libraries News, 78(2), 79–82.

Snyder, J. (2013). Wikipedia: Librarians’ perspectives on its use as a reference source. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 53(2), 155–163.

Stitzlein, H., Han, M.-J. K., & Benson, S. R. (2018). Unraveling challenges: Rights statements in digital cultural heritage collections. Journal of Library Metadata, 18(3/4), 135–150.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques & procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Szajewski, M. (2013). Using Wikipedia to enhance the visibility of digitized archival assets. D-Lib Magazine, 19(3/4).

Terras, M. (2015a). Opening access to collections: The making and using of open digitised cultural content. Online Information Review, 39(5), 733–752.

Terras, M. (2015b). So you want to reuse digital heritage content in a creative context? Good luck with that. Art Libraries Journal, 40(4), 33–37.

Vetter, M., & Harrington, S. (2013). Integrating special collections into the composition classroom: A case study of collaborative digital curriculum. Research Library Issues, 283, 16–20.




How to Cite

Kelly, E. J. (2019). Digital Cultural Heritage and Wikimedia Commons Licenses:: Copyright or Copywrong?. Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship, 3(3), 1-25.