How to Fight Fair Use Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt: The Experience of One Open Educational Resource

Abstract

At the launch of one of the early online open educational resources (OER) in 2002, the approach to addressing copyright was uncertain. Did the university or the faculty own their material? How would the third-party material be handled? Was all of its use considered fair use under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act (Title 17, United States Code) because of its educational purpose? Or was permission-seeking necessary for this project to succeed and protect the integrity of faculty and university? For many years, this OER was conservative in its approach to third-party material, avoiding making fair use claims on the theory that it was too risky and difficult to prove in the face of an infringement claim. Additionally, being one of the early projects of its kind, there was fear of becoming a target for ambitious copyright holders wanting to make headlines (and perhaps win lawsuits). It was not until 2009 that the Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for OpenCourseWare was written by a community of practitioners who believed that if fair use worked for documentary film makers, video creators, and others (including big media), it worked in open education as well. Once this Code was adopted, universities and institutions were able to offer more rich and complete course content to their users than before. This paper explains how it happened at this early open educational resource offering.

Author Biography

Lindsey Weeramuni, MIT
Manager, Intellectual Property MSc LIS
MIT Office of Digital Learning
NE49 - 2nd floor / Cambridge, MA 02142
Phone 617.253.2738
http://odl.mit.edu/

References

Arnone, M. (2001). Princeton pulls out of high-profile distance-learning alliance. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(13), A29.

Association of Independent Video and Filmmakers, Independent Feature Project, International Documentary Association, National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture, and Women in Film & Video (Washington, D.C. chapter). (2005. November). Documentary filmmakers’ statement of best practices in fair use. Retrieved from http://cmsimpact.org/code/documentaryfilmmakers-statement-of-best-practices-in-fair-use/

Aufderheide, P., & Jaszi, P. 2011. Reclaiming fair use: How to put balance back in copyright. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, c2011.

Carlson, S., & Carnevale, D. (2001). Debating the demise of NYUonline. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(12), A31–32.

A Committee of Practitioners of OpenCourseWare in the United 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

Creative Commons. (n.d.). Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

Dunn, K. (2014, April 29). MIT libraries launches online fair use quiz for students [blog post]. Retrieved from https://libraries.mit.edu/news/libraries-launches/15118/

Finnie, E. (n.d.). Fair use quiz. Retrieved December 1, 2017, from https://libraries.mit.edu/files/ospcl/fair-use-quiz/

Goldberg, C. (2001, April 4). Auditing classes at M.I.T., on the Web and free. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/04/us/auditing-classes-at-mit-on-the-web-and-free.html

Smith, K. (2017). Foibles and follies, part three [blog post]. Retrieved September 27, 2017 from http://intheopen.net/2017/09/foibles-and-follies-part-three/

Wiley, D. (n.d.). Defining the ‘open’ in open content and open educational resources. Retrieved September 24, 2017, from from http://opencontent.org/definition/

Published
2019-03-06