Decoding Academic Fair Use: Transformative Use and the Fair Use Doctrine in Scholarship

  • Matthew D. Bunker University of Alabama

Abstract

Fair use in copyright law is an enormously complex legal doctrine.  Although much scholarly attention has been paid to fair use in the context of teaching -- particularly in on-line education -- relatively little research exists on the problem of fair use in scholarship. This article analyzes reported federal cases on fair use in scholarly contexts, with a particular emphasis on the transformative use doctrine that has become enormously influential in fair use determinations. The article explores insights from this body of case law that may assist future scholars wishing to fairly use copyrighted expression in their scholarship.

Author Biography

Matthew D. Bunker, University of Alabama

Reese Phifer Professor of Journalism

Department of Journalism & Creative Media

References

American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc., 60 F.3d 913 (2d Cir. 1994).

Aufderheide, P. & Jaszi, P. (2011). Reclaiming fair use: How to put balance back in copyright. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2013).

Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014).

Bezanson, R. P. & Miller, J. M. (2010). Scholarship and fair use. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, 33, 409–470.

Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Ltd., 448 F.3d 605 (2d Cir. 2006).

Bunker, M. D. (2010). The song remains the same: Transformative purpose analysis in fair use law. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 170–192.

Butler, B. (2015). Transformative teaching and educational fair use after Georgia State. Connecticut Law Review, 48, 473–530.

Cambridge University Press v. Patton, 769 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2014).

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994).

Center for Media & Social Impact. (2017). Codes of best practices. Retrieved from http://cmsimpact.org/codes-of-best-practices/

Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 107 (2012).

Cousins, A. D. (2009). The Shakespeare encyclopedia: The complete guide to the man and his works. Richmond Hill, ON: Firefly Books.

Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003).

Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. Passport Video, 349 F.3d 622 (9th Cir. 2003).

Ezor, J. I. (2013). Streaming while teaching: The legality of using personal streaming video accounts for the classroom. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, 23, 221–236.

Fargnoli, A. N. & Gillespie, M. P. (1995). James Joyce a to z: The essential reference to the life and works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gerhardt, D. & Wessell, M. (2010). Fair use and fairness on campus. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 11, 461–530.

Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985).

Hofheinz v. A & E Television Networks, 146 F.Supp.2d 442 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).

Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Co., 621 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1980).

Jaszi, P. (2013). Fair use and education: The way forward. Law & Literature, 25, 33–57.

Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2003).

Lange, D. L. & Powell, H. J. (2009). No law: Intellectual property in the image of an absolute First Amendment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.

Leaffer, M. (2010). Understanding copyright law. Dayton, OH: LexisNexis.

Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a fair use standard. Harvard Law Review, 103, 1105–1136.

Netanel, N. W. (2011). Making sense of fair use. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 15, 715–771.

Netanel, N. W. (2008). Copyright’s paradox. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Nimmer, D. (2003). “Fairest of them all’ and other fair use fairy tales. Law & Contemporary Problems, 77, 263–287.

Nimmer, M. & Nimmer, D. (2016). Nimmer on copyright. Miamisburg, OH: Matthew Bender & Co.

Nunez v. Caribbean Int’l News Corp., 235 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2000).

Packard, A. (2002). Copyright or copy wrong: An analysis of university claims to faculty work. Communication Law & Policy, 7, 275–316.

Patry, W. F. (2014). Patry on fair use. New York, NY: Thompson Reuters.

Rothman, J. E. (2010). Best intentions: Reconsidering best practices statements in the context of fair use and copyright law. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A., 57, 371–387.

Rubin v. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., 836 F.Supp. 909 (D. Mass. 1993).

Ryan, M. (1999). Fair use and academic expression: Rhetoric, reality, and restriction on academic freedom. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 8, 541–598.

Sag, M. (2012). Predicting fair use. Ohio State Law Journal, 73, 47–89.

Samuelson, P. (2009). Unbundling fair use. Fordham Law Review, 77, 2537–2621.

Simon, D. A. (2010). Teaching without infringement: A new model for educational fair use. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, and Entertainment Law Journal, 20, 453–561.

Sundeman v. The Seajay Society, Inc., 142 F.3d 194 (4th Cir. 1998).

Universal City Studios v. Sony Corp. of America, 659 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1981) rev’d, 464 U.S. 417 (1984).

Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v. RDR Books, 575 F.Supp.2d 513 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).

Published
2019-02-25