Collaborative Academic Library Digital Collections Post-Cambridge University Press, HathiTrust and Google Decisions on Fair Use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jcel.v1i1.5921Abstract
Academic libraries face numerous stressors as they seek to meet the needs of their users through technological advances while adhering to copyright laws. This paper seeks to explore one specific proposal to balance these interests, the impact of recent decisions on its viability, and the copyright challenges that remain after these decisionsMetrics
References
References
Beebe, B. An empirical study of U.S. copyright fair use opinions, 1978-2005. (2008). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156(3), 549-624
Leval, P.N. (1990) Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 103(5), 1105-1136
Lowry, C.B. (2013). ARL budgets after the Great Recession, 2011-13. Retrieved from http://publications.arl.org/rli282/2
Netanel, N.W. (2011). Making sense of fair use, 15 Lewis & Clark Law Review, 15(3), 715-771
Nimmer, D. (2003). “Fairest of them All” and other fairy tales of fair use. Law & Contemporary Problems 66(1-2), 263-288
Nimmer, M.B. & Nimmer, D. Nimmer on copyright.
Novak, J. (2013). eBook lending platforms, Against the Grain, 25(6), 22-26.
Patry, W.F. (1985). The fair use privilege in copyright law at 351. Washington, DC: BNA Books.
Patry, W.F. Patry on copyright
Tafuri, N. (2014). Prices of U.S. and foreign published materials. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/files/content/resources/collect/serials/ppi/LMPI_2014Article.pdf.
Tushnet, R. (2009). Economies of desire: fair use and marketplace assumptions, 51 William & Mary Law Review, 51(2), 513-546.
Wu, M.M. & Lee, L.A. (2012). An empirical study on the research and critical evaluation skills of law students, 31 Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 33(3-4), 205-238.
Wu, M.M. (2011). Building a collaborative digital collection: a necessary evolution in libraries, Law Library Journal, 103(4), 527-551.
Cases
American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, 60 F.3d 913 (1994)
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F.3d 202 (2015)
Authors Guild, Inc., v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87 (2014)
Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1879)
Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko’s Graphics Corp, 758 F. Supp. 1522 (1991).
Boosey & Hawkes Music Publishers, Ltd. v. Walt Disney Co., 145 F.3d 481 (1998)
Cambridge University Press v. Patton, 769 F.3d 1232 (2014)
Campbell v. Acuff Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1990)
Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F. Cas. 342 (D. Mass. 1841)
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985)
Hoehling v. University City Studios, Inc., 618 F.2d 972 (1980)
Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811 (2002)
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, 508 F.3d 1146 (2007)
Random House, Inc. v. Rosetta Books, LLC, 150 F.Supp.2d 613 (2001)
Sony Corporation of America v. Universal Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)
Twin Peaks Production Inc. v. Publications Intern, Inc., 996 F.2d 1366 (1993)
Williams & Wilkins Co. v. U.S., 487 F.2d 1345 (1973)
Worldwide Church of God v. Philadelphia Church of God, Inc., 227 F.3d 1110 (2000)
Other Legal Materials
H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476 (1976).
S. Rep. No. 94-473 (1976)
