Open Access Legislation and Regulation in the United States: Implications for Higher Education


  • Anjam Chaudhary Central Michigan University
  • Kathy Irwin University Libraries, Central Michigan University
  • David Hoa Khoa Nguyen School of Education, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)



Accessing quality research when not part of an academic institution can be challenging. Dating back to the 1980s, open access (OA) was a response to journal publishers who restricted access to publications by requiring a subscription and limited access to knowledge. Although the OA movement seeks to remove costly barriers to accessing research, especially when funded by state and federal governments, it remains the subject of continuous debates. After providing a brief overview of OA, this article summarizes OA statutory and regulatory developments at the federal and state levels regarding free and open access to research. It compares similarities and differences among enacted and proposed legislation and describes the advantages and disadvantages of these laws. It analyzes the effects of these laws in higher education, especially on university faculty regarding tenure and promotion decisions as well as intellectual property rights to provide recommendations and best practices regarding the future of legislation and regulation in the United States.


Alliance for Taxpayer Access. (2019). FASTR: The Fair Access to Science & Technology Research Act.

Altmetric. (n.d.). Altmetric for researchers.

Alperin, J. P., Morales, E., & McKiernan, E. (2019, July 17). Academic review promotion and tenure documents promote a view of open access that is at odds with the wider academic community. London School of Economics and Political Science.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2018, March 23). Trump, Congress approve largest U.S. research spending increase in a decade. Science News Magazine.

American Association of University Professors. (2006, October). Copyrights and wrongs.

American Association of University Professors. (2013, November). Academic freedom and electronic communications.

Anderson, R. (2013, February 19). It’s FASTR—Is it better? Scholarly Kitchen.

Arunachalam, S. (2017). Social justice in scholarly publishing: Open access is the only way. American Journal of Bioethics, 17(10), 15–39.

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2018, February). Standards for libraries in higher education.

Bailey, J. (2014, September 22). Why copyright matters in research. iThenticate Plagiarism Blog.

Basken, P. (2016, July 7). The U. of California’s open-access promise hits a snag: The faculty. Chronicle of Higher Education.

Beall, J. (2015, May–June). What the open-access movement doesn’t want you to know. American Association of University Professors.

Beall, J. (2016, May 25). Essential information about predatory publishers and journals. International Higher Education, 86, 2–3.

Blankstein, M., & Wolff-Eisenberg, C. (2019, April 12). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2018.

Brown, S. (2007, February 9). Peer pressure. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(23), A18.

Butler, D. (2003, October 9). Scientific publishing: Who will pay for open access? Nature, 425, 554–555.

Butler, D. (2013, March 27). Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature, 495(7442), 433–435. https://doi:10.1038/495433a

California Legislative Information. (2018, September 7). AB-2192. State-funded research: Grant requirements.

California Legislative Information. California Government Code. §§ Title 2. Division 3. Part 4.5. (2014).

Clarivate. (1994, June 20). The Clarivate analytics impact factor.

Creative Commons. (n.d.). About CC licenses.

CREDO Action et al. (2013, June 20). Letter in support of AB 609.

Crotty, D. (2015, January 15). Compliance: The coming storm. Scholarly Kitchen.

Crotty, D. (2016, June 28). Paying for compliance: A potential path forward for institutional repositories. Scholarly Kitchen.

Daniel, P. T. K., & Pauken, P. D. (2015). Intellectual property and higher education. In R. Fossey & S. Eckes (Eds.), Contemporary issues in higher education law (3rd ed., pp. 475–520). Cleveland, OH: Education Law Association.

Denicola, R. C. (2006). Copyright and open access: Reconsidering university ownership of faculty research. Nebraska Law Review, 85(2), 351–382.

Des Garennes, C. (2019, June 27). Senator revising proposed research release mandate. News-Gazette.

EBSCO. (2018a). Five-year journal price increase history (2014–2018).

EBSCO. (2018b). Serials price projections, 2019.

Eisen, M. (2016, March 21). PLOS, open access and scientific societies. It is NOT junk.

Ellis, L. (2018, December 12). In talks with Elsevier, UCLA reaches for a novel bargaining chip: Its faculty. Chronicle of Higher


Eve, M.P. (2012, July 16). Gold open access does **NOT** mean: “author pays”. Martin Paul Eve.

Executive Office of the President. Office of Management and Budget. (2013, May 9). Open data policy – Managing information as an asset.

Executive Office of the President. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2013, February 22). Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research.

Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act, H.R.708, 113th Congress. (2013)

Gugliotta, G. (2012, February 27). Gulf on open access to federally financed research. New York Times.

Harington, R. (2017, September 20). Science, publishing and government bills: Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR). Scholarly Kitchen.

Harmon, E. (2018, October 18). Open access is the law in California. Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Hellyer, P. (2016). Who owns this article? Applying copyright’s work-made-for-hire doctrine to librarians’ scholarship. Law Library Journal, 108(1), 33–54.

HRK. (2019, January 15). Wiley and Projekt DEAL partner to enhance the future of scholarly research and publishing in Germany.

Holter, C. T. (2020, January). The repository, the researcher, and the REF: “It's just compliance, compliance, compliance.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(1).

Hoorn, E., & van der Graaf, M. (2006, February). Copyright issues in open access research journals. D-Lib Magazine, 12(2). doi:10.1045/february2006-vandergraaf

Howard, J. (2007, September 28). Publishers’ group revises anti-open-acces campaign. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(12), A12.

Hoyt, J., & Binfield, P. (2016, February). Everything evolves, even publishing. Against the Grain, 28(1), 25–28.

Hutchens, N. H., & Sun, J. C. (2015). Faculty expressions and legal implications. In R. Fossey & S. Eckes (Eds.), Contemporary issues in higher education law (3rd ed., pp. 125–146). Cleveland, OH: Education Law Association.

Illinois General Assembly. (2013). Open Access to Research Articles Act of 2013. §§ P.A. 98–295. Illinois Compiled Statutes.

Illinois General Assembly. (2013, February 15). Full Text of SB1900. 98th General Assembly.

Illinois State University. (2014). Open access task force report.

Kimbrough, J. L., & Gasaway, L. N. (2015). Publication of government-funded research, open access, and the public interest. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 18(2), 267–302.

Kolata, G. (2019, April 3). The price for “predatory” publishing? $50 million. New York Times.

Konkiel, S., Sugimoto, C., & Williams, S. (2016, March 7). The use of altmetrics in promotion and tenure. Educause Review.

Li, A. Y. (2019, January 25). Lessons learned: A case study of performance funding in higher education. Third Way.

Machovec, G. (2019, April 18). Publish and read mandates may change the future of journal publishing. Journal of Library Administration, 59(3), 325–333.

McDonald, B., Gibson, I., Yates, E., & Stephenson, C. (2016). An exploration of faculty experiences with open access journal publishing at two Canadian comprehensive universities. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 11(2), 1–26.

Nassi-Calò, L. (2013, September 18). How much does it cost to publish in open access? Scientific Electronic Library Online.

National Science Board. (2018, January). Expenditures and funding for academic R&D. Sources of support for academic R&D.

Nelson, C. (2013, November 15). Open access and academic freedom. Inside Higher Ed.

Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Lariviere, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6.

President and Fellows of Harvard College. Office for Scholarly Communication. (2018). Open access policies.

Priest, E. (2012). Copyright and the Harvard open access mandate. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 10(7), 377-440.

Public Library of Science. (2019). Openness inspires innovation.

Raff, J. W. (2018). Lessons learned: Eight years at the helm of Biology Open. Company of Biologists.

Ratcliffe, R. (2014, October 27). What’s the biggest challenge facing open access? Guardian.

Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies. (n.d.). How many open access policies are there worldwide?

Rentier, Bernard. (2015, September 10). Institutional repositories: It’s a matter of sticks and carrots. *Research Professional.

Rooksby, J. H. (2016). Copyright in higher education: A review of modern scholarship. Duquesne Law Review, 54(1), 197–222.

Rosinger, K., Ortagus, J., Kelchun, R., Cassell, A., & Voorhess, N. (2020, January). The landscape of performance-based funding in 2020. InformEdStates Higher Education Policy Initiative.

Schockman, E. (2016, August 7). Should the government mandate free access to taxpayer-funded research? World.

Schroter, S., & Tite, L. (2006). Open Access publishing and author-pays business models: A survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(3), 141–148.

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. The Right to Research Coalition. (2010). Why open access?

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2013, October 25). Higher education community supports public access to taxpayer funded research.

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2013a). NY state taxpayer access to publicly funded research act.

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2013b). The Illinois open access to articles act (SB 1900).

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2014). California taxpayer access to publicly funded research act (AB 609).

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2016). Browse article sharing requirements by federal agency.

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2018a). COAPI members.

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2018b). Open access.

Schonfeld, R., & Wolff-Eisenberg, C. (2019, April 15). Open access publishing: New evidence on faculty attitudes and behaviors.

Scholarly Kitchen.

Severin, A., Egger, M., Eve, MP. & Hürlimann, D. (2018). Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: An evidence-based review. [version 2; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2020, 7:1925.

Shavell, S. (2010). Should copyright of academic works be abolished? Journal of Legal Analysis, 2(1), 301–358.

Stihler, C. (2020, August 17). From CC’s new CEO: Working towards our shared future.

Straumsheim, C. (2016, May 25). Opening up the repository. Inside Higher Ed.

Suarez, A. V., & McGlynn, T. (2017, November 15). The fallacy of open-access publication. Chronicle of Higher Education.

Subbaraman, N. (2019, December 20). Rumours fly about changes to US government open-access policy. Nature.

Suber, P. (2009). Timeline of the open access movement.

Suber, P. (2015). Open access overview.

Suber, P. (2019, March 14). Open access policy options for funding agencies and universities. Knowledge Unbound.

Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5(632).

Toutloff, L. (2019, March 20). Cabells predatory report criteria v 1.1. Cabells.

University of California. (2017). eScholarship. Open access publications from the University of California.

University of California, Office of Scholarly Communication. (2015). Participate in the UC open access policies.

University of California, Office of the President. (2019, February 28). UC terminates subscriptions with world’s largest scientific publisher in push for open access to publicly funded research.

University of Cambridge. (2018, October). How much do publishers charge for open access?

University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Illinois University Library. (2015). Open access at Illinois: Policy and resources.

University of Michigan Library. (n.d.). About Deep Blue.

US Copyright Office. (2020, June). Circular 92: Copyright Law of the United States and

related laws contained in Title 17 of the United States Code.

US Department of Agriculture. (2014, November 7). Implementation plan to increase public access to results of USDA-funded scientific research.

US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2015, February 13). NOAA plan for increasing public access to research results.

US Department of Education. (2016, October 21). U.S. Department of Education plan and policy development guidance for public access: Improving access to results of federally funded scientific research.

US Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. (2013, January 9). Public Access Compliance Monitor: A new resource for institutions to track public access compliance.

US Department of Transportation. (2015, December 16). Plan to increase public access to the results of federally-funded scientific research results.

Vakil, C. (2019). Predatory journals: Authors and readers beware. Canadian Family Physician, 65(2), 92–94.

Van Noorden, R. (2013, March 27). Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature News, 495(7442), 426–429. https://doi:10.1038/495426a

Venters, M. (2015). Legal issues concerning faculty employment. In R. Fossey & S. Eckes (Eds.), Contemporary issues in higher education law (3rd ed., pp. 91–123). Cleveland, OH: Education Law Association.

Vines, T. (2018, September 20). Plan T: Scrap APCs and fund open access with submission fees. Scholarly Kitchen.

Vollmer, T. (2013, April 17). U.S. states considering public access policies. Creative Commons.

Weeden, D. (2019). Issue brief: Post-recession trends in higher education revenues. State Higher Education Executive Officers Association.

Whitaker, M. (2018, November 21). How to be strategic on the tenure track. Chronicle of Higher Education.

Zielak, P., & Sefton, J. (2020, January). Fiscal year 2019–20 higher education appropriations report: A report to the senate and House appropriations subcommittees on higher education.